thesis about methodology

Home » Research Methodology – Types, Examples and writing Guide

Research Methodology – Types, Examples and writing Guide

Table of Contents

Research methodology is the backbone of any scientific or academic study, outlining the specific strategies and tools used to collect, analyze, and interpret data. A well-defined research methodology ensures that a study is conducted systematically, yielding reliable and valid results. This article explores the concept of research methodology, its various types, practical examples, and a step-by-step guide to writing a methodology section.

Research Methodology

Research methodology refers to the systematic plan and approach employed in a study to answer research questions or test hypotheses. It defines the tools, techniques, and procedures used to collect and analyze data, ensuring the research is structured and replicable.

For example, a study exploring the impact of remote learning on student performance might use surveys to collect data and statistical analysis to evaluate the findings.

Importance of Research Methodology

Clarity and Focus: Provides a clear roadmap for the study, ensuring alignment with research objectives.
Reliability: Ensures the study’s results can be replicated and trusted.
Validity: Confirms that the methods used are appropriate for answering the research questions.
Transparency: Allows others to evaluate the study’s credibility and rigor.
Adaptability: Enables adjustments to the research process if unforeseen challenges arise.

Research Methodology Structure

1. introduction.

The introduction provides an overview of the research methodology, explaining its purpose and relevance to the study. It briefly outlines the chosen approach (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods) and justifies its suitability for addressing the research questions or hypotheses.

Example: “This research employs a mixed-methods approach to explore the impact of remote work on employee productivity, combining quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews to gain a comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon.”

2. Research Design

This section describes the overall framework or design of the study. Common research designs include experimental, descriptive, correlational, or exploratory. The design should align with the research objectives and questions.

Type of design (e.g., experimental, case study, longitudinal).
Justification for the selected design.
Example: “A descriptive research design was chosen to investigate patterns of online shopping behavior among millennials during the pandemic.”

3. Data Collection Methods

Detail the methods and tools used to gather data. This includes the type of data (primary or secondary) and the specific techniques employed.

Data sources (e.g., surveys, interviews, observations, archival records).
Instruments or tools used (e.g., questionnaires, scales, software).
Procedures for data collection.
Example: “Primary data was collected through structured questionnaires distributed online, while secondary data was sourced from industry reports and previous research studies.”

4. Sampling

Explain the sampling method used to select participants or data points for the study. Include the sample size, criteria for inclusion or exclusion, and sampling technique.

Sampling population.
Sampling technique (e.g., random, stratified, purposive).
Rationale for the chosen sample size.
Example: “A stratified random sampling method was employed to ensure representation across age groups. The final sample comprised 200 participants aged 18–60.”

5. Data Analysis Techniques

Describe the techniques or tools used to analyze the collected data. This section should differentiate between qualitative and quantitative data analysis methods.

Quantitative analysis: statistical tools (e.g., SPSS, regression analysis).
Qualitative analysis: thematic analysis, coding, or content analysis.
Software or tools used (e.g., NVivo, Excel, Python).
Example: “Quantitative data was analyzed using SPSS software for descriptive and inferential statistics, while qualitative data was thematically coded using NVivo to identify recurring patterns.”

6. Ethical Considerations

Discuss the ethical measures taken to ensure participant safety and data integrity. Ethical considerations reflect the study’s adherence to moral and professional standards.

Informed consent from participants.
Confidentiality and data security.
Approval from an institutional review board (IRB).
Example: “All participants provided informed consent, and their anonymity was ensured by assigning unique identification codes. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at XYZ University.”

7. Limitations of the Methodology

Acknowledge any methodological limitations that may affect the validity or reliability of the results.

Constraints such as sample size, geographic scope, or time frame.
Potential biases or challenges.
Example: “The study’s primary limitation was the reliance on self-reported data, which may be subject to response bias.”

8. Justification of Methodology

Provide a rationale for choosing specific methods and tools over alternatives. This reinforces the credibility of the methodology and its alignment with research objectives.

Explanation of why chosen methods are appropriate.
Comparison with other possible methods.
Example: “The mixed-methods approach was selected to capture both numerical trends and in-depth personal experiences, ensuring a holistic understanding of the research problem.”

9. Operational Definitions (Optional)

Define key terms or concepts used in the study to ensure clarity and consistency.

Example: “For this study, ‘remote work productivity’ refers to the number of tasks completed within standard working hours, as self-reported by participants.”

Types of Research Methodology

1. qualitative research methodology.

Qualitative methodology focuses on understanding human experiences, behaviors, and social phenomena. It uses non-numerical data and is often exploratory.

Subjective and descriptive.
Data collected through interviews, focus groups, or observations.
Analyzes themes, patterns, and narratives.
Example: A study exploring teachers’ perceptions of remote learning challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic.

2. Quantitative Research Methodology

Quantitative methodology focuses on measuring and analyzing numerical data to test hypotheses or answer research questions. It is often used for studies requiring statistical analysis.

Objective and structured.
Data collected through surveys, experiments, or secondary datasets.
Statistical methods used for data analysis.
Example: Examining the relationship between study hours and academic performance among high school students.

3. Mixed Methods Research Methodology

Mixed methods combine qualitative and quantitative approaches to provide a comprehensive understanding of a research problem.

Integrates numerical data with detailed narratives.
Offers both breadth and depth in analysis.
Often uses sequential or concurrent designs.
Example: Investigating how healthcare workers perceive telemedicine (qualitative) and evaluating patient satisfaction scores (quantitative).

4. Descriptive Research Methodology

Descriptive research aims to describe characteristics, phenomena, or trends in a specific population or setting.

Non-experimental.
Data collected through surveys, case studies, or observations.
Focuses on “what” rather than “why” or “how.”
Example: Surveying college students to understand their preferred learning platforms.

5. Experimental Research Methodology

Experimental research investigates cause-and-effect relationships by manipulating variables and observing outcomes.

Involves control and experimental groups.
Uses randomization to reduce bias.
Common in natural and social sciences.
Example: Testing the effectiveness of a new drug on reducing symptoms compared to a placebo.

6. Correlational Research Methodology

Correlational research examines the relationship between two or more variables without manipulating them.

Identifies positive, negative, or no correlation.
Cannot establish causation.
Data often collected through surveys or secondary datasets.
Example: Analyzing the correlation between screen time and sleep quality among teenagers.

Examples of Research Methodology

1. education.

Topic: The effectiveness of project-based learning on student engagement.
Methodology: Mixed methods involving student surveys (quantitative) and teacher interviews (qualitative).

2. Healthcare

Topic: The impact of physical activity on managing type 2 diabetes.
Methodology: Quantitative approach using clinical trials to measure blood glucose levels.

3. Business

Topic: Factors influencing employee job satisfaction in remote work environments.
Methodology: Descriptive research using online surveys to collect data from employees across industries.

4. Environmental Studies

Topic: The effect of urbanization on local biodiversity.
Methodology: Descriptive research involving field observations and quantitative data analysis of species populations.

How to Write the Methodology Section

Step 1: provide an overview.

Begin by explaining the overall research approach (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods) and justifying its suitability for addressing the research questions.

Example: “This study employs a mixed-methods approach to explore the impact of remote work on employee productivity. The combination of quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews provides a comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon.”

Step 2: Describe the Research Design

Outline the specific design used, such as experimental, descriptive, or correlational, and explain why it was chosen.

Example: “A correlational design was selected to analyze the relationship between screen time and sleep quality among high school students.”

Step 3: Detail the Data Collection Methods

Explain how data was collected, including tools, instruments, and procedures.

Example: “Data was collected using an online survey distributed to 500 participants. The survey included closed-ended questions measuring job satisfaction and open-ended questions capturing employee experiences.”

Step 4: Specify the Sampling Method

Describe the sampling strategy, including sample size, selection criteria, and sampling technique (e.g., random, stratified, convenience).

Example: “A stratified sampling technique was employed to ensure representation across different age groups. The final sample included 200 respondents aged 18–60.”

Step 5: Describe Data Analysis Techniques

Explain the methods used to analyze the data, whether statistical or thematic.

Example: “Quantitative data was analyzed using SPSS software, employing descriptive statistics and regression analysis. Qualitative data from interviews was thematically coded to identify patterns and themes.”

Step 6: Address Ethical Considerations

Discuss ethical measures such as informed consent, confidentiality, and data security.

Example: “All participants provided informed consent, and data was anonymized to maintain confidentiality. Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional review board.”

Step 7: Justify Your Choices

Provide a rationale for selecting the chosen methods and explain their relevance to the research objectives.

Example: “The use of surveys allowed for efficient data collection from a large sample, while interviews provided in-depth insights into individual experiences.”

Tips for Writing a Strong Methodology Section

Be Detailed and Specific: Provide enough detail to allow replication of your study.
Maintain Objectivity: Use neutral language and avoid subjective statements.
Link to Objectives: Ensure all methods align with the study’s research questions or hypotheses.
Use Subheadings: Organize the section into clear subsections for readability.
Cite Sources: Reference any tools, instruments, or previous studies that informed your methodology.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Lack of Clarity: Ambiguous descriptions can confuse readers and undermine credibility.
Insufficient Detail: Omitting key steps or procedures can make the study irreproducible.
Ignoring Limitations: Failing to acknowledge methodological limitations reduces transparency.
Misalignment with Objectives: Methods that do not address the research questions weaken the study’s validity.

The research methodology is a vital component of any study, laying the foundation for credible and reliable results. By selecting the appropriate type—whether qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods—and providing a clear, detailed explanation of the processes involved, researchers can ensure that their work is both rigorous and replicable. Following the writing guide and addressing common mistakes will help create a robust methodology section, contributing to the overall strength and impact of the research.

Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches . Sage Publications.
Babbie, E. (2020). The Practice of Social Research . Cengage Learning.
Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods . Oxford University Press.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice . Sage Publications.
Flick, U. (2018). An Introduction to Qualitative Research . Sage Publications.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

Conceptual Framework – Types, Methodology and...

Research Gap – Types, Examples and How to...

Research Problem – Examples, Types and Guide

Future Research – Thesis Guide

Survey Instruments – List and Their Uses

APA Table of Contents – Format and Example

Staff Directory
Library Policies
Hege Research Award
Quaker Archives
Art Gallery
Student Support
Teaching & Learning
Reserving spaces
Technology Lending
Interlibrary Loan
Course Reserves
Copyright & Fair Use
Poster Printing
Virtual Reference
Research Guides
Off-campus access
Digital Scholarship
Guilford Sources
Open Educational Resources
Quaker Collections
Digital Collections
College Archives
Underground Railroad
Universities Studying Slavery
Images & Exhibitions

Service Alert

Hege Library & Learning Technologies

Guide for Thesis Research

Introduction to the Thesis Process
Project Planning
Literature Review
Theoretical Frameworks
Research Methodology
GC Honors Program Theses
Thesis Submission Instructions This link opens in a new window
Accessing Guilford Theses from 1898 to 2020 This link opens in a new window

Basics of Methodology

Research is a process of inquiry that is carried out in a pondered, organized, and strategic manner. In order to obtain high quality results, it is important to understand methodology.

Research methodology refers to how your project will be designed, what you will observe or measure, and how you will collect and analyze data. The methods you choose must be appropriate for your field and for the specific research questions you are setting out to answer.

A strong understanding of methodology will help you:

apply appropriate research techniques
design effective data collection instruments
analyze and interpret your data
develop well-founded conclusions

Below, you will find resources that mostly cover general aspects of research methodology. In the left column, you will find resources that specifically cover qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research.

General Works on Methodology

Qualitative Research

Quantitative Research

Mixed Methods Research

<< Previous: Theoretical Frameworks
Next: Citation >>
Last Updated: Jul 22, 2024 10:48 AM
URL: https://library.guilford.edu/thesis-guide

USC Libraries
Research Guides

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper

6. The Methodology
Purpose of Guide
Design Flaws to Avoid
Independent and Dependent Variables
Glossary of Research Terms
Reading Research Effectively
Narrowing a Topic Idea
Broadening a Topic Idea
Extending the Timeliness of a Topic Idea
Academic Writing Style
Applying Critical Thinking
Choosing a Title
Making an Outline
Paragraph Development
Research Process Video Series
Executive Summary
The C.A.R.S. Model
Background Information
The Research Problem/Question
Theoretical Framework
Citation Tracking
Content Alert Services
Evaluating Sources
Primary Sources
Secondary Sources
Tiertiary Sources
Scholarly vs. Popular Resources
Qualitative Methods
Quantitative Methods
Insiderness
Using Non-Textual Elements
Limitations of the Study
Common Grammar Mistakes
Writing Concisely
Avoiding Plagiarism
Footnotes or Endnotes?
Further Readings
Generative AI and Writing
USC Libraries Tutorials and Other Guides
Bibliography

The methods section describes actions taken to investigate the research problem and the rationale for the application of specific procedures or techniques used to identify, select, process, and analyze information applied to understanding the problem, thereby, allowing the reader to critically evaluate a study’s overall validity and reliability. The methodology section of a research paper answers two main questions: How was the data collected or generated? And, how was it analyzed? The writing should be direct and precise and always written in the past tense.

Kallet, Richard H. "How to Write the Methods Section of a Research Paper." Respiratory Care 49 (October 2004): 1229-1232.

Importance of a Good Methodology Section

You must explain how you obtained and analyzed your results for the following reasons:

Readers need to know how the data was obtained because the method you chose affects the results and, by extension, how you interpreted their significance in the discussion section of your paper.
Methodology is crucial for any branch of scholarship because an unreliable method produces unreliable results and, as a consequence, undermines the value of your analysis of the findings.
In most cases, there are a variety of different methods you can choose to investigate a research problem. The methodology section of your paper clearly articulates the reasons why you have chosen a particular procedure or technique.
The reader wants to know that the data was collected or generated in a way that is consistent with accepted practice in the field of study. For example, if you are using a multiple choice questionnaire, readers need to know that it offered your respondents a reasonable range of answers to choose from.
The method must be appropriate to fulfilling the overall aims of the study. For example, you need to ensure that you have a large enough sample size to be able to generalize and make recommendations based on the findings.
The methodology should discuss the problems that were anticipated and the steps you took to prevent them from occurring. For any problems that do arise, you must describe the ways in which they were minimized or why these problems do not impact in any meaningful way your interpretation of the findings.
In the social and behavioral sciences, it is important to always provide sufficient information to allow other researchers to adopt or replicate your methodology. This information is particularly important when a new method has been developed or an innovative use of an existing method is utilized.
In a qualitative study, the reader needs to know that standard protocols concerning how you treated any human subjects were correctly followed [e.g., people you observed and interviewed] and how you controlled for your presence in the study as the primary instrument for gathering information during interactions with respondents.

Bem, Daryl J. Writing the Empirical Journal Article. Psychology Writing Center. University of Washington; Denscombe, Martyn. The Good Research Guide: For Small-Scale Social Research Projects . 5th edition. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press, 2014; Lunenburg, Frederick C. Writing a Successful Thesis or Dissertation: Tips and Strategies for Students in the Social and Behavioral Sciences . Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, 2008.

Structure and Writing Style

I. Groups of Research Methods

There are two main groups of research methods in the social sciences:

The e mpirical-analytical group approaches the study of social sciences in a similar manner that researchers study the natural sciences . This type of research focuses on objective knowledge, research questions that can be answered yes or no, and operational definitions of variables to be measured. The empirical-analytical group employs deductive reasoning that uses existing theory as a foundation for formulating hypotheses that need to be tested. This approach is focused on explanation.
The i nterpretative group of methods is focused on understanding phenomenon in a comprehensive, holistic way . Interpretive methods focus on analytically disclosing the meaning-making practices of human subjects [the why, how, or by what means people do what they do], while showing how those practices arrange so that it can be used to generate observable outcomes. Interpretive methods allow you to recognize your connection to the phenomena under investigation. However, the interpretative group requires careful examination of variables because it focuses more on subjective knowledge.

In both groups of research methods, the outcomes of applying methodological techniques for gathering and interpreting information are referred to as "findings" or "results."

II. Content

The introduction to your methodology section should begin by restating the research problem and the theory and underlying assumptions underpinning your study. This is followed by situating the methods you used to gather, analyze, and process information within the overall “tradition” of your field of study and within the particular research design you have chosen to study the problem [i.e., In this case study, I conducted a content analysis of..."]. If the method you choose lies outside of the tradition of your field [i.e., the review of the literature demonstrates that the method is not commonly used], provide a justification for how your choice of methods specifically addresses the research problem in ways that could reveal new insights or understandings. Explain why is this approach important but do not interpret the outcomes until the discussion section of your paper.

The remainder of your methodology section should describe the following:

Decisions made in selecting the data you have analyzed or, in the case of qualitative research, the subjects and research setting you have examined,
Tools and methods used to identify and collect information, and how you identified relevant variables,
The ways in which you processed the information and the procedures you used to analyze that information, and
The specific research tools or strategies that you utilized to study the underlying hypothesis and research questions.

In addition, an effectively written methodology section should:

Re-introduce the overall methodological approach for investigating your research problem . Is your study qualitative or quantitative or a combination of both (mixed method)? Are you going to take a special approach, such as action research, or a more neutral stance?
Indicate how the approach fits the overall research design . Your methods for gathering information should have a clear connection to the research problem. In other words, make sure that your methods will actually address the problem. One of the most common deficiencies found in research papers is that the proposed methodology is not suitable to achieving the stated objective of your paper.
Describe the specific methods for collecting information that you used , such as, surveys, interviews, questionnaires, observation, archival research, etc. If you are analyzing existing information, such as a data set or archival documents, describe how it was originally created or gathered and by whom. Also be sure to explain how older data is still relevant to investigating the current research problem.
Explain how you intend to analyze your results . Will you use statistical analysis? Will you use specific theoretical perspectives to help you analyze a text or explain observed behaviors? Describe how you plan to obtain an accurate assessment of relationships, patterns, trends, distributions, and possible contradictions found in the data.
Provide background and a rationale for methodologies that are unfamiliar for your readers . Very often in the social and behavioral sciences, research problems and the methods for investigating them require more explanation and rationale than widely accepted rules governing the natural and physical sciences. Be clear and concise in your explanation.
Provide a justification for subject selection and sampling procedure . For instance, if you propose to conduct interviews, how do you intend to select the sample population? If you are analyzing texts, which texts have you chosen, and why? If you are using statistics, why is this set of data being used? If other data sources exist, explain why the data you chose is most appropriate to addressing the research problem.
Provide a justification for case study selection . A common method of analyzing research problems in the social sciences is to analyze specific cases. These can be a person, place, event, phenomenon, or other type of subject of analysis that are either examined as a singular topic of in-depth investigation or multiple topics of investigation studied for the purpose of comparing or contrasting findings. In either approach, you should explain why the case or cases were chosen and how they relate to understanding the research problem.
Describe potential limitations . Are there any practical limitations that could affect your data collection? How will you attempt to control for potential confounding variables and errors? If your methodology may lead to problems you can anticipate, state this openly and show why pursuing this methodology outweighs the risk of these problems cropping up.

NOTE: Once you have written all of the elements of the methods section, subsequent revisions should focus on how to present those elements as clearly and as logically as possibly. The description of how you prepared to study the research problem, how you gathered the information, and the protocol for analyzing the information should be organized chronologically. For clarity, when a large amount of detail must be presented, information should be presented in sub-sections according to topic. If necessary, consider using appendices for raw data.

ANOTHER NOTE: If you are conducting a qualitative analysis of a research problem , the methodology section generally requires a more elaborate description of the methods used as well as an explanation of the processes applied to gathering and analyzing the information than is generally required for studies using quantitative methods. Because you are the primary instrument for generating the information [e.g., through interviews or observations], the process for collecting that information has a significantly greater impact on producing the findings. Therefore, qualitative research requires a more detailed description of the methods used.

YET ANOTHER NOTE: If your study involves interviews, observations, or other qualitative techniques involving human subjects , you may be required to obtain approval from the USC's Office for the Protection of Research Subjects before beginning your research. This is not a common procedure you need to follow for research and writing assignments in undergraduate classes. However, i f your professor states you need approval, you must include a statement in your methods section that you received official endorsement and adequate informed consent from the office and that there was a clear assessment and minimization of risks to participants and to the university. This statement informs the reader that your study was conducted in an ethical and responsible manner. In some cases, the approval notice is included as an appendix to your paper.

III. Problems to Avoid

Irrelevant Detail The methodology section of your paper should be thorough but concise. Do not provide any background information that does not directly help the reader understand why a particular method was chosen, how the information was gathered or obtained, and how that information was analyzed in relation to the research problem [note: analyzed, not interpreted! Save how you interpreted the findings for the discussion section]. With this in mind, the page length of your methods section will generally be less than any other section of your paper except the introduction and conclusion.

Unnecessary Explanation of Basic Procedures Remember that you are not writing a how-to guide about a particular method. You should make the assumption that readers possess a basic understanding of how to investigate the research problem on their own and, therefore, you do not have to go into great detail about specific methodological procedures. The focus should be on how you applied a method , not on the mechanics of doing a method. An exception to this rule is if you select an unconventional methodological approach; if this is the case, be sure to explain why this approach was chosen and how it enhances the overall process of discovery.

Problem Blindness It is almost a given that you will encounter problems when collecting or generating your data, or, gaps will exist in existing data or archival materials. Do not ignore these problems and pretend they did not occur. Often, documenting how you overcame obstacles can form an interesting part of how you gathered information and where gaps may exist for future research. It demonstrates to the reader that you can provide a cogent rationale for the decisions you made to minimize the impact of any problems that arose.

Literature Review Just as the literature review section of your paper provides an overview of sources you have examined while researching a particular topic, the methodology section should cite any sources that informed your choice and application of a particular method [i.e., the choice of a survey should include any citations to the works you used to help construct the survey].

It’s More than Sources of Information! A description of a research study's method should not be confused with a description of the sources of information. Such a list of sources is useful in and of itself, especially if it is accompanied by an explanation about the selection and use of the sources. The description of the project's methodology complements a list of sources in that it sets forth the organization and interpretation of information emanating from those sources.

Azevedo, L.F. et al. "How to Write a Scientific Paper: Writing the Methods Section." Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia 17 (2011): 232-238; Blair Lorrie. “Choosing a Methodology.” In Writing a Graduate Thesis or Dissertation , Teaching Writing Series. (Rotterdam: Sense Publishers 2016), pp. 49-72; Butin, Dan W. The Education Dissertation A Guide for Practitioner Scholars . Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin, 2010; Carter, Susan. Structuring Your Research Thesis . New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012; Kallet, Richard H. “How to Write the Methods Section of a Research Paper.” Respiratory Care 49 (October 2004):1229-1232; Lunenburg, Frederick C. Writing a Successful Thesis or Dissertation: Tips and Strategies for Students in the Social and Behavioral Sciences . Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, 2008. Methods Section. The Writer’s Handbook. Writing Center. University of Wisconsin, Madison; Rudestam, Kjell Erik and Rae R. Newton. “The Method Chapter: Describing Your Research Plan.” In Surviving Your Dissertation: A Comprehensive Guide to Content and Process . (Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications, 2015), pp. 87-115; What is Interpretive Research. Institute of Public and International Affairs, University of Utah; Writing the Experimental Report: Methods, Results, and Discussion. The Writing Lab and The OWL. Purdue University; Methods and Materials. The Structure, Format, Content, and Style of a Journal-Style Scientific Paper. Department of Biology. Bates College.

Writing Tip

Statistical Designs and Tests? Do Not Fear Them!

Don't avoid using a quantitative approach to analyzing your research problem just because you have anxiety about applying statistical designs and tests. A qualitative approach, such as conducting interviews or content analysis of archival texts, can yield exciting new insights about a research problem, but it should not be undertaken simply because you have a disdain for running a simple regression. A well designed quantitative research study can often be accomplished in very clear and direct ways, whereas, a similar study of a qualitative nature usually requires considerable time to analyze large volumes of information and a tremendous burden to create new paths for analysis where previously no path associated with your research problem had existed.

To locate data and statistics, GO HERE .

Another Writing Tip

Knowing the Relationship Between Theories and Methods

There can be multiple meanings associated with the term "theories" and the term "methods" in social sciences research. A helpful way to delineate between them is to understand "theories" as representing different ways of characterizing the social world when you research it and "methods" as representing different ways of generating and analyzing information about that social world. Framed in this way, all empirical social sciences research involves theories and methods, whether they are stated explicitly or not. However, while theories and methods are often related, it is important that, as a researcher, you deliberately separate them in order to avoid your theories playing a disproportionate role in shaping what outcomes your chosen methods produce.

Introspectively engage in an ongoing dialectic between the application of theories and methods to help enable you to use the outcomes from your methods to interrogate and develop new theories, or ways of conceptually framing the research problem. This is how scholarship grows and branches out into new intellectual territory.

Reynolds, R. Larry. Ways of Knowing. Alternative Microeconomics . Part 1, Chapter 3. Boise State University; The Theory-Method Relationship. S-Cool Revision. United Kingdom; Dulock, Helen L., and William L. Holzemer. "Substruction: Improving the Linkage from Theory to Method." Nursing Science Quarterly 4 (Summer 1991): 83-87.

Yet Another Writing Tip

Methods and the Methodology

Do not confuse the terms "methods" and "methodology." As Schneider notes, a method refers to the technical steps taken to do research . Descriptions of methods usually include defining and stating why you have chosen specific techniques to investigate a research problem, followed by an outline of the procedures you used to systematically select, gather, and process the information [remember to always save the interpretation of information for the discussion section of your paper].

The methodology refers to a discussion of the underlying reasoning why particular methods were used . This discussion includes describing the theoretical concepts that inform the choice of methods to be applied, placing the choice of methods within the more general nature of academic work, and reviewing its relevance to examining the research problem. The methodology section also includes a thorough review of the methods other scholars have used to study the research problem.

Bryman, Alan. "Of Methods and Methodology." Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal 3 (2008): 159-168; Schneider, Florian. “What's in a Methodology: The Difference between Method, Methodology, and Theory…and How to Get the Balance Right?” PoliticsEastAsia.com. Chinese Department, University of Leiden, Netherlands.

<< Previous: Scholarly vs. Popular Resources
Next: Qualitative Methods >>
Last Updated: Nov 15, 2024 2:33 PM
URL: https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide